🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager endured defeat by Grimsby. He weathered losing a crucial European final against one of the worst Spurs sides in living memory. He could survive losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering some of the club’s best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, labeling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. But there was a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, similar to numerous top-flight right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and seems to have failed. Even the most casual observer can see the irony here: a coach who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels crumbling in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating football executives.

In truth, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to regard Jason Wilcox as merely a drudge in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada rather than any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals will now be rightly wary.

A Tactical Conflict Regarding Formation & Ideology

To illustrate, it was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the hierarchy that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim originally, played a key role in trying to persuade Amorim to abandon his beloved formation. Naturally, these pleas met a certain resistance. However, such directives hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable soccer background of Jason Wilcox, a veteran of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with full compensation, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals of this sport – individuals such as him – simply operate on a plane beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Desiring an explanation is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power Behind Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the real power behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, in reality, merely executing the commands of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has made very clear his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, Ratcliffe has also suggested deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to adopt data science and metrics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in these intricate football matters, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and as we all know, the rich are superior: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the construction of a new stadium that looks similar to an abstract design, the acquisition of Benjamin Sesko?

A Modern Soccer Order: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff such as coaches, scouts – even footballers. Perhaps it was once possible for a young, visionary coach with ideas and energy to join an organization and implement their plan through to completion. Yet how many companies have such individuals established? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to determine the tactics by the directors and hire someone who can tailor their offering accordingly. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to change. Enzo Maresca leads a team of literal children into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder indefinitely.

The Neoliberal Game: Responsibility for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents corporate governance at work: the rise of a gilded overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices are always untouchable, whose mistakes can invariably be sacked away without explanation. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then fire him for playing excessively 3-4-3. Hire the project manager and later bin him for taking excessive time. And above all show gratitude; for the incremental increases in ticket costs, for your new player acquisitions, for the fact that the grownups – however well qualified – are in charge.